Hall v ADP Dealer Services Ltd (Age Discrimination) [2014] UKEAT 0390_13_2301 (23 January 2014)

Hall v ADP Dealer Services Ltd (Age Discrimination) [2014] UKEAT 0390_13_2301 (23 January 2014)

The Employment Tribunal did not err in law in refusing to extend time for the age discrimination claim; it considered the relevant evidence and factors, and its decision was within its discretion. No error of law or perversity was established.

Citation
[2014] UKEAT 0390_13_2301
Parties
Appellant: Claimant (Appellant); Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
23 January 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Age Discrimination, Extension of Time, Jurisdiction, Just and Equitable Test
Employment Law Discrimination Law Age Discrimination Extension of Time Jurisdiction Just and Equitable Test

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Claimant (Appellant)

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in refusing to extend time for an age discrimination claim under the Equality Act 2010
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider relevant factors or provide adequate reasons for its decision
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal's findings were legally perverse

Ratio Decidendi

The Employment Tribunal did not err in law in refusing to extend time for the age discrimination claim; it considered the relevant evidence and factors, and its decision was within its discretion. No error of law or perversity was established.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No extension of time granted for the age discrimination claim
  • Claim dismissed