Sullivan v Bury Street Capital Ltd (DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION) [2020] UKEAT 0317_19_0909 (09 September 2020)

Sullivan v Bury Street Capital Ltd (DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION) [2020] UKEAT 0317_19_0909 (09 September 2020)

The Tribunal did not err in law in concluding that the claimant was not disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010, as the substantial adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities was not long-term nor likely to recur, and the respondent did not have actual or constructive knowledge of any such disability.

Citation
[2020] UKEAT 0317_19_0909
Parties
Appellant: Claimant (Appellant); Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
09 September 2020
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Disability Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Constructive Knowledge of Disability, Long Term Adverse Effect, Equality Act 2010

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Claimant (Appellant)

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was disabled within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010
  2. 2 Whether the substantial adverse effect was long-term or likely to recur
  3. 3 Whether the respondent had actual or constructive knowledge of disability

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal did not err in law in concluding that the claimant was not disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010, as the substantial adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities was not long-term nor likely to recur, and the respondent did not have actual or constructive knowledge of any such disability.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed