Sullivan v Bury Street Capital Ltd (DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION) [2020] UKEAT 0317_19_0909 (09 September 2020)
The Tribunal did not err in law in concluding that the claimant was not disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010, as the substantial adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities was not long-term nor likely to recur, and the respondent did not have actual or constructive knowledge of any such disability.
- Citation
- [2020] UKEAT 0317_19_0909
- Parties
- Appellant: Claimant (Appellant); Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Constructive Knowledge of Disability, Long Term Adverse Effect, Equality Act 2010
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claimant (Appellant)
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was disabled within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010
- 2 Whether the substantial adverse effect was long-term or likely to recur
- 3 Whether the respondent had actual or constructive knowledge of disability
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal did not err in law in concluding that the claimant was not disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010, as the substantial adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities was not long-term nor likely to recur, and the respondent did not have actual or constructive knowledge of any such disability.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment