EB v. BA [2008] UKEAT 0139_08_0407 (4 July 2008)
The claimant's 'nil return' did not comply with the unless order, given the context and intention behind the order. The Tribunal was entitled to strike out the claim automatically upon breach and to refuse relief from sanctions, as the claimant's conduct was deliberate, uncooperative, and prejudicial to case management.
- Citation
- [2008] UKEAT 0139_08_0407
- Parties
- Appellant: Claimant (EB); Respondent: Respondent (BA)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal Against Strike Out and Review Decisions
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out Orders, Unless Orders, Review of Tribunal Decisions, Burden of Proof, Case Management, Sex Discrimination, Gender Reassignment, Relief From Sanctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claimant (EB)
Appellant
Respondent (BA)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal Against Strike Out and Review Decisions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant breached the unless order
- 2 Whether the strike out was proper
- 3 Whether relief from sanctions should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's 'nil return' did not comply with the unless order, given the context and intention behind the order. The Tribunal was entitled to strike out the claim automatically upon breach and to refuse relief from sanctions, as the claimant's conduct was deliberate, uncooperative, and prejudicial to case management.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Strike out of claim stands
- No relief from sanctions granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment