Pine v Cinven Ltd (Practice and Procedure: Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity) [2017] UKEAT 0411_14_0802 (08 February 2017)
The appeal against the case management order fails because any procedural irregularity was overtaken by subsequent events, the medical records were not used at the Remedies Hearing, and no unfairness or prejudice resulted from the order. Previous appeals against substantive and procedural decisions were dismissed, and there is no tenable basis for further appeal.
- Citation
- [2017] UKEAT 0411_14_0802
- Parties
- Appellant: Claimant; Respondent: Cinven Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal Against Case Management Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bias, Misconduct, Procedural Irregularity, Case Management Orders, Reasonable Adjustments, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claimant
Appellant
Cinven Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal Against Case Management Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the case management order of 17 May 2013 was procedurally unfair
- 2 Whether the Employment Judge lost sight of justice or was biased
- 3 Whether the requirement to produce medical records was improper
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal against the case management order fails because any procedural irregularity was overtaken by subsequent events, the medical records were not used at the Remedies Hearing, and no unfairness or prejudice resulted from the order. Previous appeals against substantive and procedural decisions were dismissed, and there is no tenable basis for further appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment