Simpson v Strathclyde Police & Anor (Practice and Procedure : Imposition of Deposit) [2012] UKEAT 0030_11_1001 (10 January 2012)

The Employment Judge did not err in law by including the student loan as income or by setting the deposit order at £380, as the amount was reasonable in all the circumstances and sufficient reasons were given. The appeal was refused as no error of law was identified.

Citation: [2012] UKEAT 0030_11_1001
Parties: Appellant: Claimant; Respondent: First Respondent; Respondent: Second Respondent
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 10 January 2012
Procedural Posture: Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Deposit Order Amount
Outcome: Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Deposit Order, Ability to Pay, Student Loan as Income, Reasoning for Orders, Appeal Procedure

Employment Law Civil Procedure Deposit Order Ability to Pay Student Loan as Income Reasoning for Orders Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5

Parties

Claimant

Appellant

First Respondent

Respondent

Second Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Deposit Order Amount

Legal Issues

1 Whether the Employment Judge erred in setting the deposit order at £380
2 Whether student loan should be considered as income for deposit order
3 Whether sufficient reasons were given for the amount of the deposit order

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

Order dismissing the appeal
Order upholding the Employment Tribunal's deposit order of £380