Fraser v University Of Leicester & Ors (Race Discrimination) [2014] UKEAT 0155_13_0506 (5 June 2014)
The Tribunal correctly applied the burden of proof, considered both individual and thematic complaints, found no facts from which race discrimination or victimisation could be inferred, and provided adequate reasons; no error of law was disclosed.
- Citation
- [2014] UKEAT 0155_13_0506
- Parties
- Appellant: Claimant; Respondent: First Respondent; Respondent: Second Respondent; Respondent: Third Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Burden of Proof, Victimisation, Harassment, Time Limits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claimant
Appellant
First Respondent
Respondent
Second Respondent
Respondent
Third Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in applying the burden of proof in race discrimination claims
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to adopt a holistic approach to multiple allegations of discrimination
- 3 Whether the Tribunal failed to draw proper inferences from responses to statutory questionnaires
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal correctly applied the burden of proof, considered both individual and thematic complaints, found no facts from which race discrimination or victimisation could be inferred, and provided adequate reasons; no error of law was disclosed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment