Roberts v GB Oils Ltd (Right To Be Accompanied) [2013] UKEAT 0177_13_1410 (14 October 2013)
The right to be accompanied at a disciplinary hearing under s.10 ERA 1999 is the employee's, and the employer cannot refuse the companion based on their identity or qualities if they fall within s.10(3). Waiver of this statutory right is prohibited. The word 'reasonably' qualifies the request to be accompanied, not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] UKEAT 0177_13_1410
- Parties
- Appellant: Claimant; Respondent: GB Oils Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Right to Be Accompanied, Statutory Interpretation, Waiver of Statutory Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claimant
Appellant
GB Oils Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an employee's right to be accompanied at a disciplinary hearing under s.10 Employment Relations Act 1999 can be waived
- 2 Whether the employer can refuse a companion based on their identity or qualities
- 3 Proper construction of 'reasonably requests' in s.10(1)(b) ERA 1999
Ratio Decidendi
The right to be accompanied at a disciplinary hearing under s.10 ERA 1999 is the employee's, and the employer cannot refuse the companion based on their identity or qualities if they fall within s.10(3). Waiver of this statutory right is prohibited. The word 'reasonably' qualifies the request to be accompanied, not the choice of companion.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Claim remitted to Employment Tribunal for assessment of compensation under s.11 Employment Relations Act 1999
- No order for costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment