Claridge v. Daler Rowney Ltd [2008] UKEAT 0188_08_0407 (4 July 2008)
The Tribunal was entitled to find that, although the employer's handling of the grievance was open to criticism and involved some unreasonable delay, it did not fall outside the range of reasonable responses and was not sufficiently fundamental to amount to a repudiatory breach of contract. Therefore, there was no...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] UKEAT 0188_08_0407
- Parties
- Appellant: [Claimant]; Respondent: [Respondent]
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Grievance Procedures, Breach of Contract, Trust and Confidence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
[Claimant]
Appellant
[Respondent]
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was constructively dismissed due to the employer's handling of the grievance procedure
- 2 Whether the delay in the grievance process amounted to a repudiatory breach of contract
- 3 Whether the Employment Tribunal misapplied the legal test from Abbey National plc v Fairbrother
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was entitled to find that, although the employer's handling of the grievance was open to criticism and involved some unreasonable delay, it did not fall outside the range of reasonable responses and was not sufficiently fundamental to amount to a repudiatory breach of contract. Therefore, there was no constructive dismissal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The decision of the Employment Tribunal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment