Flint v Coventry University (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2014] UKEAT 0147_14_0909 (09 September 2014)
The Employment Tribunal, having decided that the claimant's means were relevant, failed to properly consider the evidence regarding his ability to pay, relied on irrelevant or outdated material, and reached a perverse conclusion. The costs order could not stand and must be remitted for reconsideration.
- Citation
- [2014] UKEAT 0147_14_0909
- Parties
- Appellant: Claimant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Costs Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; costs order set aside; matter remitted to Employment Tribunal for reconsideration.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Tribunal Procedure, Discretion, Ability to Pay
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claimant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal properly considered the claimant's means and ability to pay when making a costs order
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's decision was perverse or based on irrelevant/insufficient evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal, having decided that the claimant's means were relevant, failed to properly consider the evidence regarding his ability to pay, relied on irrelevant or outdated material, and reached a perverse conclusion. The costs order could not stand and must be remitted for reconsideration.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; costs order set aside; matter remitted to Employment Tribunal for reconsideration.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The costs order of £9,000 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment