Razak v IHS Global Ltd (Jurisdictional Points: Extension of time: just and equitable) [2015] UKEAT 0331_14_0302 (03 February 2015)

Razak v IHS Global Ltd (Jurisdictional Points: Extension of time: just and equitable) [2015] UKEAT 0331_14_0302 (03 February 2015)

There was no error of law in the Employment Tribunal's finding that the 31 allegations were not part of a continuing course of conduct including the dismissal, and that it was not just and equitable to extend time for those claims.

Citation
[2015] UKEAT 0331_14_0302
Parties
Appellant: Claimant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
03 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Jurisdiction, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Case Management
Employment Law Discrimination Law Extension of Time Jurisdiction Sex Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Case Management

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Claimant

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 31 allegations of discrimination were part of a continuing course of conduct including the dismissal and thus in time
  2. 2 Whether it was just and equitable to extend time for the 31 allegations

Ratio Decidendi

There was no error of law in the Employment Tribunal's finding that the 31 allegations were not part of a continuing course of conduct including the dismissal, and that it was not just and equitable to extend time for those claims.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.