Stages v. Jackson & Canter (A Firm) [2008] UKEAT 0600_07_3103 (31 March 2008)
The Tribunal did not err in law; it considered all relevant adjustments and found the Respondent had either made reasonable adjustments or was not required to do so, as the Claimant did not establish facts shifting the burden of proof. The appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2008] UKEAT 0600_07_3103
- Parties
- Appellant: Claimant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Reasonable Adjustments, Constructive Unfair Dismissal, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claimant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal failed to consider the list of reasonable adjustments identified by the Claimant
- 2 Whether the Respondent was under a duty to make reasonable adjustments for the Claimant's disability
- 3 Whether the Respondent knew or ought to have known of the Claimant's disability
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal did not err in law; it considered all relevant adjustments and found the Respondent had either made reasonable adjustments or was not required to do so, as the Claimant did not establish facts shifting the burden of proof. The appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment