Hamdoun v London General Transport Services Ltd & Anor (Practice and Procedure: Striking-out/dismissal) [2015] UKEAT 0414_14_0605 (06 May 2015)
The unless order related only to disclosure (B2), which was complied with; the Judge erred in striking out the claim for failure to comply with inspection (B3), which was not covered by the unless order. Automatic strike-out cannot follow for non-compliance with the spirit or intention of an order, only its letter.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] UKEAT 0414_14_0605
- Parties
- Appellant: Claimant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Strike Out Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; strike-out order set aside
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out Orders, Unless Orders, Disclosure and Inspection, Costs in Appeal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claimant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Strike Out Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant complied with the unless order
- 2 Whether the automatic strike-out was valid
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded against the Claimant
Ratio Decidendi
The unless order related only to disclosure (B2), which was complied with; the Judge erred in striking out the claim for failure to comply with inspection (B3), which was not covered by the unless order. Automatic strike-out cannot follow for non-compliance with the spirit or intention of an order, only its letter.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; strike-out order set aside
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The strike-out order is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment