Saunders v. Department for Work and Pensions - Child Support Agency [2009] UKEAT 0052_09_1409 (14 September 2009)
The Tribunal erred by failing to add the finding of unlawful discrimination to the preceding conduct when assessing constructive dismissal and by misconstruing the resignation letter as equivocal when it was unequivocal except for procedural requirements.
- Citation
- [2009] UKEAT 0052_09_1409
- Parties
- Appellant: Claimant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Disability Discrimination, Final Straw Doctrine, Resignation Letter Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claimant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in its approach to the 'final straw' doctrine in constructive dismissal
- 2 Whether the Claimant's resignation letter was unequivocal acceptance of repudiation
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred by failing to add the finding of unlawful discrimination to the preceding conduct when assessing constructive dismissal and by misconstruing the resignation letter as equivocal when it was unequivocal except for procedural requirements.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- constructive dismissal claim remitted to same Employment Tribunal for reconsideration
- Claimant's application for costs refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment