Western Union Payment Services UK Ltd v Anastasiou [2014] UKEAT 0135_13_1205 (12 May 2014)

Western Union Payment Services UK Ltd v Anastasiou [2014] UKEAT 0135_13_1205 (12 May 2014)

The matter must be remitted to the same Employment Tribunal because the errors identified leave open more than one possible outcome, and only the Tribunal as the fact-finding body can determine the correct result.

Citation
[2014] UKEAT 0135_13_1205
Parties
Appellant: Claimant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
12 May 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Disposal Hearing
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Protected Disclosure, Causation, Natural Justice, Remittal Procedure
Employment Law Protected Disclosure Causation Natural Justice Remittal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Claimant

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Disposal Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Did the Employment Tribunal correctly identify and define the protected disclosure?
  2. 2 Did the Tribunal err in its approach to causation?
  3. 3 Was there a breach of natural justice in the conduct of the Tribunal proceedings?

Ratio Decidendi

The matter must be remitted to the same Employment Tribunal because the errors identified leave open more than one possible outcome, and only the Tribunal as the fact-finding body can determine the correct result.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • matter remitted to the same Employment Tribunal for further consideration