PFS Merchandise Ltd & Ors v. Cunningham [2000] UKEAT 301_00_1705 (17 May 2000)
There was both oral and documentary evidence before the Employment Tribunal to support the finding that the Applicant was employed by PFS Merchandise Ltd at the time of dismissal; no arguable point of law was raised by the appeal.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 301_00_1705
- Parties
- Applicant: Clare Cunningham; Respondent: PFS Merchandise Ltd; Respondent: Mr Fairbrass; Respondent: Mr Lloyd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Notice Pay, Holiday Pay, Employer Identity, Joint and Several Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clare Cunningham
Applicant
PFS Merchandise Ltd
Respondent
Mr Fairbrass
Respondent
Mr Lloyd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal's finding that the Applicant was employed by PFS Merchandise Ltd on 5 May 1999 was supported by evidence
- 2 Whether Messrs Lloyd and Fairbrass are jointly and severally liable with PFS for pay in lieu of notice and holiday pay
Ratio Decidendi
There was both oral and documentary evidence before the Employment Tribunal to support the finding that the Applicant was employed by PFS Merchandise Ltd at the time of dismissal; no arguable point of law was raised by the appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No arguable point of law; appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment