Miss R Crocker v Clarke Willmott LLP (England and Wales : Jurisdictional Points) [2017] UKET 1400646/2017 (25 September 2017)

The Tribunal determined whether it had jurisdiction to hear the claim based on the facts and statutory provisions.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 1400646/2017
Parties: Claimant: Miss R Crocker; Respondent: Clarke Willmott LLP
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 25 September 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Jurisdictional Points
Outcome: Jurisdiction determined
Legal Topics: Jurisdiction, Employment Tribunal Procedure

Employment Law Jurisdiction Employment Tribunal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Miss R Crocker

Claimant

Clarke Willmott LLP

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Jurisdictional Points

Legal Issues

1 Whether the Employment Tribunal has jurisdiction over the claim

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal determined whether it had jurisdiction to hear the claim based on the facts and statutory provisions.

Court Disposition

Jurisdiction determined

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.