Cointreau v CLS Rmy Cointreau (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17233 (07 May 2016)
The Panel found that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark, that the Respondent had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. Accordingly, the domain name should be transferred to the Complainant.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] DRS 17233
- Parties
- Complainant: Cointreau; Respondent: CLS Rmy Cointreau
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to Complainant
- Legal Topics
- Trademark Infringement, Domain Name Transfer
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cointreau
Complainant
CLS Rmy Cointreau
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the Respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
- 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark, that the Respondent had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. Accordingly, the domain name should be transferred to the Complainant.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to Complainant
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the Complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment