COLIN WISEMAN v Revenue & Customs (CAPITAL GAINS TAX - Information notice issued under Schedule 36 to the Finance Act 2008) [2022] UKFTT 75 (TC) (25 August 2020)

COLIN WISEMAN v Revenue & Customs (CAPITAL GAINS TAX - Information notice issued under Schedule 36 to the Finance Act 2008) [2022] UKFTT 75 (TC) (25 August 2020)

Ten of the twelve disputed documents (seven letters, two telephone notes, and one meeting note from 3 September 2002) are privileged as their dominant purpose was the seeking or giving of legal advice between client and solicitor; two documents relating to the 31 July 2002 meeting are not privileged as their dominant purpose was not legal advice, and privileged content cannot be separated for redaction, so they must be disclosed.

Citation
[2022] UKFTT 75 (TC)
Parties
Applicant: Colin Wiseman; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
25 August 2020
Procedural Posture
Tax Tribunal Application Under Information Notice: Resolution of Disputes as to Privileged Communications Regulations 2009 / Determination of Privilege Dispute Under Written Representations, No Oral Hearing
Outcome
Partially allowed; privilege upheld for ten documents, disclosure ordered for two documents.
Legal Topics
Legal Professional Privilege, Disclosure of Documents, Capital Gains Tax, Information Notices, Privilege Disputes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Colin Wiseman

Applicant

The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Tax Tribunal Application Under Information Notice: Resolution of Disputes as to Privileged Communications Regulations 2009 / Determination of Privilege Dispute Under Written Representations, No Oral Hearing

  1. 1 Whether documents requested by HMRC under Schedule 36 to the Finance Act 2008 are protected by legal professional privilege and thus exempt from disclosure
  2. 2 Whether redaction of privileged content is appropriate or possible in the disputed documents

Ratio Decidendi

Ten of the twelve disputed documents (seven letters, two telephone notes, and one meeting note from 3 September 2002) are privileged as their dominant purpose was the seeking or giving of legal advice between client and solicitor; two documents relating to the 31 July 2002 meeting are not privileged as their dominant purpose was not legal advice, and privileged content cannot be separated for redaction, so they must be disclosed.

Court Disposition

Partially allowed; privilege upheld for ten documents, disclosure ordered for two documents.

Orders

  • Applicant to disclose the two documents relating to the 31 July 2002 meeting to HMRC no later than 56 days after the date of release of this decision, unless an application for permission to appeal is made, in which case disclosure is extended until 14 days after final resolution of such appeal.
  • Ten documents (seven letters, two telephone notes, one meeting note from 3 September 2002) are not to be disclosed as they are privileged.