Mr G Walker v Colins Tyres (Scotland : Contract of Employment) [2019] UKET 4100077/2019 (18 February 2019)

The tribunal determined whether the relationship between the parties constituted a contract of employment based on mutuality of obligation and control.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2019] UKET 4100077/2019
Parties: Claimant: Mr G Walker; Respondent: Colins Tyres
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 18 February 2019
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Judgment for the respondent
Legal Topics: Contract of Employment

Employment Law Contract of Employment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr G Walker

Claimant

Colins Tyres

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was employed under a contract of employment

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined whether the relationship between the parties constituted a contract of employment based on mutuality of obligation and control.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the respondent

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.