Complete Solutions Europe Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax - Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme - fixed rate or non fixed rate employees - reference salary) [2025] UKFTT 1116 (TC) (19 September 2025)
The spa engineers were not fixed rate employees under the CJRS Direction; reference salary for CJRS claims must be calculated using the averaging method including all pay in respect of the period up to the day before furlough, even if paid after that date; HMRC's assessments must be reduced accordingly.
- Citation
- [2025] UKFTT 1116 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Complete Solutions Europe Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; assessments reduced and remitted for recalculation.
- Legal Topics
- Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, Income Tax Assessments, Reference Salary Calculation, Furlough Scheme, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Complete Solutions Europe Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether spa engineers were fixed rate or variable rate employees under the CJRS Direction
- 2 How reference salary should be calculated for CJRS claims for non-fixed rate employees
- 3 Whether HMRC's assessments and calculation methods were correct
Ratio Decidendi
The spa engineers were not fixed rate employees under the CJRS Direction; reference salary for CJRS claims must be calculated using the averaging method including all pay in respect of the period up to the day before furlough, even if paid after that date; HMRC's assessments must be reduced accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; assessments reduced and remitted for recalculation.
Orders
- Assessments 2 and 3 reduced to nil.
- Assessments 1 and 4 upheld in principle but to be reduced based on correct averaging method including pay for period up to 22 March 2020.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment