Computer Insight Ltd v Stewart & Anor [1997] UKEAT 1216_97_0912 (9 December 1997)
No relevant transfer of undertaking occurred between CIL and IML or PCSL; tribunals correctly applied the law and weighed relevant factors; no arguable point of law for appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1997] UKEAT 1216_97_0912
- Parties
- Appellant: Computer Insight Ltd; Respondent: Instant Muscle Ltd; Respondent: Personnel Consultancy Services Ltd; Applicant: Mr Stewart; Applicant: Mr Shokunbi; Respondent: Training for Jobs Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Undertakings, Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy Payment, TUPE, Acquired Rights Directive
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Computer Insight Ltd
Appellant
Instant Muscle Ltd
Respondent
Personnel Consultancy Services Ltd
Respondent
Mr Stewart
Applicant
Mr Shokunbi
Applicant
Training for Jobs Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a relevant transfer of undertaking occurred under TUPE
- 2 Whether the dismissal of employees was unfair
- 3 Whether redundancy payments were due
Ratio Decidendi
No relevant transfer of undertaking occurred between CIL and IML or PCSL; tribunals correctly applied the law and weighed relevant factors; no arguable point of law for appeal.
Court Disposition
appeals dismissed
Orders
- Both appeals dismissed; no full appeal hearing will proceed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment