Miss D Christian v Cooltemple Construction Services Ltd (England and Wales : Maternity and Pregnancy Rights : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 2402945/2017 (21 July 2017)

The tribunal found that the respondent breached the claimant's maternity and pregnancy rights and failed to comply with the Working Time Regulations, entitling the claimant to remedies.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 2402945/2017
Parties: Claimant: Miss D Christian; Respondent: Cooltemple Construction Services Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 21 July 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Maternity and Pregnancy Rights, Working Time Regulations

Employment Law Maternity and Pregnancy Rights Working Time Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Miss D Christian

Claimant

Cooltemple Construction Services Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent breached maternity and pregnancy rights under employment law
2 Whether the respondent breached the Working Time Regulations

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent breached the claimant's maternity and pregnancy rights and failed to comply with the Working Time Regulations, entitling the claimant to remedies.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay compensation to the claimant for breach of maternity and pregnancy rights
Respondent to pay compensation for breach of Working Time Regulations

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.