Mr J Walker-Bryan v Cordell Group Ltd (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Protective Award : Redundancy : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 1800854/2017 (26 June 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, redundancy procedures were not properly followed, and unlawful deductions from wages occurred.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 1800854/2017
Parties: Claimant: Mr J Walker-Bryan; Respondent: Cordell Group Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 26 June 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Protective Award, Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations

Employment Law Breach of Contract Protective Award Redundancy Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages Working Time Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mr J Walker-Bryan

Claimant

Cordell Group Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
2 Whether there was a breach of contract
3 Whether redundancy procedures were followed

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, redundancy procedures were not properly followed, and unlawful deductions from wages occurred.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay compensation for unfair dismissal
Respondent to pay for unlawful deduction from wages

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.