Mr NA Binns and others v Cordell Group Ltd (in Administration) and another (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Protective Award : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 1800912/2017 (5 October 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimants were unfairly dismissed without proper procedure, were entitled to protective awards due to lack of consultation, and suffered unlawful deductions from wages. The respondents failed to comply with statutory obligations under employment law.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 1800912/2017
Parties: Claimant: Mr NA Binns and others; Respondent: Cordell Group Ltd (in Administration) and another
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 05 October 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claims upheld in favour of the claimants
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Protective Award, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations

Employment Law Breach of Contract Protective Award Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages Working Time Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr NA Binns and others

Claimant

Cordell Group Ltd (in Administration) and another

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimants were unfairly dismissed
2 Whether there was a breach of contract
3 Whether there was an unlawful deduction from wages

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Claims upheld in favour of the claimants

Orders

Respondents to pay compensation for unfair dismissal
Respondents to pay protective awards

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.