Miss A Crook v Countrywide (England and Wales : Age Discrimination) [2019] UKET 3306654/2018 (26 February 2019)

The tribunal determined whether the claimant was treated less favourably because of her age in violation of the Equality Act 2010.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2019] UKET 3306654/2018
Parties: Claimant: Miss A Crook; Respondent: Countrywide
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 26 February 2019
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Judgment delivered
Legal Topics: Age Discrimination

Employment Law Age Discrimination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Miss A Crook

Claimant

Countrywide

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of age

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined whether the claimant was treated less favourably because of her age in violation of the Equality Act 2010.

Court Disposition

Judgment delivered

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.