CPL Distribution Ltd v. Evans & Ors [2001] UKEAT 0669_01_2311 (23 November 2001)
The Tribunal's finding that Mrs Todd was not assigned to the concessionary coal contract but rather to Mr Brennan, regardless of his role, was not perverse and was a permissible conclusion based on the evidence and correct legal test.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 0669_01_2311
- Parties
- Appellant: CPL Distribution Ltd; Respondent: Mrs Todd; Respondent: Gateway Fuels; Respondents: Respondents 1-6 and 11-15
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Preliminary Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Undertakings, Assignment of Employees, Redundancy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CPL Distribution Ltd
Appellant
Mrs Todd
Respondent
Gateway Fuels
Respondent
Respondents 1-6 and 11-15
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Preliminary Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Todd was assigned to the concessionary coal contract for purposes of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's finding was perverse
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's finding that Mrs Todd was not assigned to the concessionary coal contract but rather to Mr Brennan, regardless of his role, was not perverse and was a permissible conclusion based on the evidence and correct legal test.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; Tribunal's decision affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment