LEGO Juris A/S v Craig Hindmarsh (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2013] DRS 12279 (29 January 2013)

LEGO Juris A/S v Craig Hindmarsh (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2013] DRS 12279 (29 January 2013)

The complainant established all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy; the domain name was ordered to be transferred to the complainant.

Citation
[2013] DRS 12279
Parties
Complainant: LEGO Juris A/S; Respondent: Craig Hindmarsh
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
29 January 2013
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Trademark Infringement, Domain Name Transfer
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Trademark Infringement Domain Name Transfer

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LEGO Juris A/S

Complainant

Craig Hindmarsh

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or similar to a trademark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy; the domain name was ordered to be transferred to the complainant.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to LEGO Juris A/S