Creative Support Ltd v. Egene [2009] UKEAT 0025_09_1205 (12 May 2009)
The Employment Tribunal erred by upholding a claim of race discrimination based on an act not specifically complained about by the claimant, violating the principle in Chapman v Simon that tribunals may only adjudicate complaints actually made.
- Citation
- [2009] UKEAT 0025_09_1205
- Parties
- Appellant: Creative Support Limited; Respondent: Mr P A Egene
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Direct Discrimination, Burden of Proof, Adequacy of Reasoning
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Creative Support Limited
Appellant
Mr P A Egene
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred by upholding a claim of race discrimination based on a complaint not made by the claimant
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to identify a relevant comparator
- 3 Whether the Tribunal's reasoning met the adequacy requirement
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal erred by upholding a claim of race discrimination based on an act not specifically complained about by the claimant, violating the principle in Chapman v Simon that tribunals may only adjudicate complaints actually made.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Employment Tribunal's finding of race discrimination set aside
- Claims under the Race Relations Act 1976 dismissed except as specified
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment