Elite Promotions -v- Creative Talent Management [2002] DRS 267 (16 May 2002)
The complainant established common law rights in 'Elite Promotions' through long-term use. The domain name 'elite-speakers.co.uk' was found similar due to the dominant use of 'Elite' and the overlap in business activities. The respondent's registration and use of the domain name was held to be abusive, as it was intended to attract business intended for the complainant by leveraging the complainant's reputation.
- Citation
- [2002] DRS 267
- Parties
- Complainant: Elite Promotions; Respondent: Creative Talent Management
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Passing Off, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elite Promotions
Complainant
Creative Talent Management
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark similar to the disputed domain name
- 2 Whether the respondent's registration and use of the domain name constitutes abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established common law rights in 'Elite Promotions' through long-term use. The domain name 'elite-speakers.co.uk' was found similar due to the dominant use of 'Elite' and the overlap in business activities. The respondent's registration and use of the domain name was held to be abusive, as it was intended to attract business intended for the complainant by leveraging the complainant's reputation.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld
Orders
- The domain name elite-speakers.co.uk is to be cancelled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment