Igbinake v Axis Security Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Appellate jurisdiction/Reasons/Burns-Barke) [2014] UKEAT 0028_14_1706 (17 June 2014)
The Tribunal's reasoning on the crucial issue of the manager's belief and the policy's content was insufficiently clear, necessitating remission for reconsideration.
- Citation
- [2014] UKEAT 0028_14_1706
- Parties
- Appellant's Counsel: Edward Kemp; Respondent's Counsel: Kerry Bretherton; Respondent: Croner Consulting Limited
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Remitted for reconsideration
- Legal Topics
- Direct Discrimination, Religious Discrimination, Employment Tribunal Procedure, Appellate Review, Reasons for Decision
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Edward Kemp
Appellant's Counsel
Kerry Bretherton
Respondent's Counsel
Croner Consulting Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the refusal of holiday was direct religious discrimination
- 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal's reasons were adequate and consistent with evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's reasoning on the crucial issue of the manager's belief and the policy's content was insufficiently clear, necessitating remission for reconsideration.
Court Disposition
Remitted for reconsideration
Orders
- Matter remitted to the same Employment Tribunal for reconsideration of the decision in light of the Appeal Tribunal's judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment