Mr D Edmonds and Mrs A Wright and Ms R Lloyd v CUK Brands Ltd (in Liquidation) (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2017] UKET 2601540/2016 (6 April 2017)

Mr D Edmonds and Mrs A Wright and Ms R Lloyd v CUK Brands Ltd (in Liquidation) (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2017] UKET 2601540/2016 (6 April 2017)

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with its statutory duty to consult, and therefore a protective award was appropriate.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] UKET 2601540/2016
Parties
Claimant: Mr D Edmonds; Claimant: Mrs A Wright; Claimant: Ms R Lloyd; Respondent: CUK Brands Ltd (in Liquidation)
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
06 April 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award
Outcome
Protective award granted in favour of the claimants.
Legal Topics
Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Consultation Requirements
Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancy Consultation Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr D Edmonds

Claimant

Mrs A Wright

Claimant

Ms R Lloyd

Claimant

CUK Brands Ltd (in Liquidation)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent failed to consult with employees as required before redundancies
  2. 2 Whether a protective award should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with its statutory duty to consult, and therefore a protective award was appropriate.

Court Disposition

Protective award granted in favour of the claimants.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay protective award to each claimant.