Muff & Ors (t/a Wits End) v. Wheelwright [2003] UKEAT 0664_03_1311 (13 November 2003)
No rare and exceptional circumstances exist to justify extension of time; Registrar’s refusal to accept late appeal upheld.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 0664_03_1311
- Parties
- Applicant: D J Wheelwright; Respondent: Jason Muff; Respondent: Simon Rose; Respondent: Judith Barkham
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Registrar’s Order / Judgment on Appeal Against Refusal to Accept Notice of Appeal as Out of Time
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Deductions, Breach of Contract, Extension of Time for Appeal, Disability Accommodations
Employment Law Unlawful Deductions Breach of Contract Extension of Time for Appeal Disability Accommodations
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
D J Wheelwright
Applicant
Jason Muff
Respondent
Simon Rose
Respondent
Judith Barkham
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Registrar’s Order / Judgment on Appeal Against Refusal to Accept Notice of Appeal as Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether extension of time should be granted for late Notice of Appeal
- 2 Whether Respondents were prevented from attending Tribunal due to disability or confusion
- 3 Whether there was an employment relationship between Applicant and Respondents
Ratio Decidendi
No rare and exceptional circumstances exist to justify extension of time; Registrar’s refusal to accept late appeal upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Notice of Appeal dismissed
- Registrar’s decision upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment