Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v Dalai (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2014] DRS 14685 (22 September 2014)

Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v Dalai (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2014] DRS 14685 (22 September 2014)

The panel found that the complainant satisfied all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] DRS 14685
Parties
Complainant: Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft; Respondent: Dalai
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
22 September 2014
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
domain name transferred
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Transfer Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft

Complainant

Dalai

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or similar to the complainant's trademark
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant satisfied all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Court Disposition

domain name transferred

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.