Dalkia Energy & Technical Services Ltd v. Elverson [2001] UKEAT 828_01_1510 (15 October 2001)

Dalkia Energy & Technical Services Ltd v. Elverson [2001] UKEAT 828_01_1510 (15 October 2001)

The Tribunal found a fundamental breach of contract by the appellant, specifically the breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, which was the effective cause of the respondent's resignation and amounted to unfair constructive dismissal. The Tribunal's reasons were clear and sufficient, and there was no basis for reducing the compensatory award or for a deduction for accelerated receipt.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 828_01_1510
Parties
Appellant: Dalkia Energy & Technical Services Ltd; Respondent: James William Elverson
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
15 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Breach of Contract, Remedies, Compensatory Award
Employment Law Constructive Dismissal Unfair Dismissal Breach of Contract Remedies Compensatory Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dalkia Energy & Technical Services Ltd

Appellant

James William Elverson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent was constructively and unfairly dismissed
  2. 2 Whether the compensatory award should be reduced due to likelihood of resignation or accelerated receipt
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal's reasons were sufficiently clear

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found a fundamental breach of contract by the appellant, specifically the breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, which was the effective cause of the respondent's resignation and amounted to unfair constructive dismissal. The Tribunal's reasons were clear and sufficient, and there was no basis for reducing the compensatory award or for a deduction for accelerated receipt.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed at preliminary hearing; Tribunal's decision and compensatory award upheld.