Zulily Inc v Dan Goldstein (Full Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 9620 (04 April 2011)

Zulily Inc v Dan Goldstein (Full Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 9620 (04 April 2011)

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name 'Zulily' and that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive, warranting a transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] DRS 9620
Parties
Complainant: Zulily Inc; Respondent: Dan Goldstein
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
04 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
domain name transferred
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Transfer Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zulily Inc

Complainant

Dan Goldstein

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in respect of a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name 'Zulily' and that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive, warranting a transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Court Disposition

domain name transferred

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.