Kamazoy Virtual IT Department v Daniel Dainty (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 20622 (16 November 2018)

Kamazoy Virtual IT Department v Daniel Dainty (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 20622 (16 November 2018)

The complainant demonstrated rights in the name and the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting transfer.

Citation
[2018] DRS 20622
Parties
Complainant: Kamazoy Virtual IT Department; Respondent: Daniel Dainty
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
16 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer granted
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Passing Off
Intellectual Property Domain Name Transfer Passing Off

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kamazoy Virtual IT Department

Complainant

Daniel Dainty

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration was abusive
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in the name

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant demonstrated rights in the name and the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting transfer.

Court Disposition

Transfer granted

Orders

  • Domain name to be transferred to complainant