David Spicer v Daniel Ebanks (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2014] DRS 13590 (10 March 2014)

David Spicer v Daniel Ebanks (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2014] DRS 13590 (10 March 2014)

The complainant established rights in the name and the respondent's registration was found to be abusive; therefore, the domain name should be transferred.

Citation
[2014] DRS 13590
Parties
Complainant: David Spicer; Respondent: Daniel Ebanks
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
10 March 2014
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
domain name transferred
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Transfer Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Spicer

Complainant

Daniel Ebanks

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name should be transferred to the complainant
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's registration was abusive

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name and the respondent's registration was found to be abusive; therefore, the domain name should be transferred.

Court Disposition

domain name transferred

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.