Daniel Odoom v Information Commissioner (Dismissed : Freedom of Information Act 2000) [2017] UKFTT 2016_0316 (GRC) (02 May 2017)

The Tribunal found that the Information Commissioner correctly applied the relevant exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and lawfully refused access to the requested information.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKFTT 2016_0316 (GRC)
Parties: Applicant: Daniel Odoom; Respondent: Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 02 May 2017
Procedural Posture: Freedom of Information Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Freedom of Information Act 2000, Right to Access Information

Information Law Freedom of Information Act 2000 Right to Access Information

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Daniel Odoom

Applicant

Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Freedom of Information Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the Information Commissioner correctly applied the Freedom of Information Act 2000 in refusing access to requested information

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Information Commissioner correctly applied the relevant exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and lawfully refused access to the requested information.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

No order as to costs

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.