Tarmac Ltd v Herman [2008] DRS 5514 (1 May 2008)
The complainant has rights in the TARMAC mark, which is similar to the domain name. The respondent's use of the domain name is abusive, taking unfair advantage of and being unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights, particularly by associating the mark with adult content and the word 'terrorist'. No legitimate interest or innocent explanation was advanced by the respondent.
- Citation
- [2008] DRS 5514
- Parties
- Complainant: Tarmac Ltd; Respondent: Dariusz Herman
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service Complaint / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Domain name transfer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Trade Marks, Abusive Registration, Domain Name Transfer
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tarmac Ltd
Complainant
Dariusz Herman
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service Complaint / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the respondent is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant has rights in the TARMAC mark, which is similar to the domain name. The respondent's use of the domain name is abusive, taking unfair advantage of and being unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights, particularly by associating the mark with adult content and the word 'terrorist'. No legitimate interest or innocent explanation was advanced by the respondent.
Court Disposition
Domain name transfer ordered
Orders
- The domain name tarmacterrorist.co.uk is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment