Vaughan v Revenue & Customs (VAT - AVOIDANCE : Other) [2018] UKFTT 776 (TC) (31 December 2018)
From 1 December 2013, the floor screeding activities were carried on by a partnership separate from the plastering activities carried on by the Appellant as a sole trader. Prior to that date, both activities were a single business. HMRC cannot treat the activities as a single business after 1 December 2013 without a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 776 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Darren Vaughan; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 31 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Registration Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- VAT Registration, Business Disaggregation, Partnership Law
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Darren Vaughan
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Registration Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plastering and floor screeding activities constituted a single business or two separate businesses for VAT purposes
- 2 Whether HMRC can retrospectively register the plastering business for VAT
Ratio Decidendi
From 1 December 2013, the floor screeding activities were carried on by a partnership separate from the plastering activities carried on by the Appellant as a sole trader. Prior to that date, both activities were a single business. HMRC cannot treat the activities as a single business after 1 December 2013 without a direction under Schedule 1, paragraphs 1A and 2 of VATA, which would only have prospective effect.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- From 1 December 2013, plastering and floor screeding activities are treated as separate businesses for VAT purposes.
- HMRC cannot retrospectively treat the activities as a single business after 1 December 2013 without a direction under Schedule 1, paragraphs 1A and 2 of VATA.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment