Vaughan v Revenue & Customs (VAT - AVOIDANCE : Other) [2018] UKFTT 776 (TC) (31 December 2018)
From 1 December 2013, the floor screeding activities were carried on by a partnership separate from the Appellant's sole trader plastering business; prior to that date, both activities were a single business. HMRC cannot treat the activities as a single business after 1 December 2013 without a direction under paragraphs 1A and 2 of Schedule 1 to VATA, which would only have prospective effect.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 776
- Parties
- Appellant: Darren Vaughan; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 31 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Substantive Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- VAT Registration, Business Disaggregation, Partnership Law, Artificial Separation, Retrospective Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Darren Vaughan
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Substantive Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plastering and floor screeding activities constituted a single business or two separate businesses for VAT purposes
- 2 Whether HMRC could retrospectively register the plastering business for VAT
Ratio Decidendi
From 1 December 2013, the floor screeding activities were carried on by a partnership separate from the Appellant's sole trader plastering business; prior to that date, both activities were a single business. HMRC cannot treat the activities as a single business after 1 December 2013 without a direction under paragraphs 1A and 2 of Schedule 1 to VATA, which would only have prospective effect.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- From 1 December 2013, the floor screeding and plastering activities are separate businesses for VAT purposes.
- Prior to 1 December 2013, both activities constituted a single business for VAT purposes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment