Data Select Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 535 (TC) (05 August 2010)

Data Select Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 535 (TC) (05 August 2010)

The Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence that the decision was not received in April 2009 and did not act with due diligence upon receiving the decision in March 2010. The Tribunal was not persuaded that there were persuasive reasons to justify an extension of time, and the application was refused.

Citation
[2011] UKFTT 535 (TC)
Parties
Appellant: Data Select Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
05 August 2010
Procedural Posture
VAT Input Tax Appeal (application for Extension of Time) / Application for Permission to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Application for extension of time to appeal refused.
Legal Topics
VAT Input Tax Claims, Time Limits for Appeals, Tribunal Discretion, Extension of Time, Value Added Tax Act 1994 S.83 G
Tax Law Administrative Law VAT Input Tax Claims Time Limits for Appeals Tribunal Discretion Extension of Time Value Added Tax Act 1994 S.83 G

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Data Select Limited

Appellant

The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

VAT Input Tax Appeal (application for Extension of Time) / Application for Permission to Appeal Out of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal should grant an extension of time for the Appellant to appeal against HMRC's decision to deny input tax claim under s.83G(6) VATA 1994

Ratio Decidendi

The Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence that the decision was not received in April 2009 and did not act with due diligence upon receiving the decision in March 2010. The Tribunal was not persuaded that there were persuasive reasons to justify an extension of time, and the application was refused.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time to appeal refused.