Artemis Investment Management LLP v David Carmichael (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 15191 (10 February 2015)

Artemis Investment Management LLP v David Carmichael (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 15191 (10 February 2015)

The complainant demonstrated rights in the name and the registration was found to be abusive; transfer is warranted.

Citation
[2015] DRS 15191
Parties
Complainant: Artemis Investment Management LLP; Respondent: David Carmichael
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
10 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer granted
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Passing Off

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Artemis Investment Management LLP

Complainant

David Carmichael

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in the name

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant demonstrated rights in the name and the registration was found to be abusive; transfer is warranted.

Court Disposition

Transfer granted

Orders

  • Domain name to be transferred to complainant