Harper v Revenue & Customs [2009] UKFTT 382 (TC) (29 December 2009)
The appellant failed to prove that the shares had any value at the time of acquisition in June 2002 and December 2003; the evidence showed the company was in financial difficulty and the shares were of negligible value from the outset. Therefore, the shares did not 'become' of negligible value as required by statute, and the relief claimed was not available.
- Citation
- [2009] UKFTT 382 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: David Harper; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Capital Gains Tax, Loss Relief, Negligible Value Claims, Share Valuation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Harper
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether shares acquired by the appellant in June 2002 and December 2003 'became' of negligible value for the purposes of s 24(2) TCGA 1992 and s 574 ICTA 1988, entitling him to loss relief.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to prove that the shares had any value at the time of acquisition in June 2002 and December 2003; the evidence showed the company was in financial difficulty and the shares were of negligible value from the outset. Therefore, the shares did not 'become' of negligible value as required by statute, and the relief claimed was not available.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment