British Institute Of Hypnotherapy v David Holland [2010] DRS 8559 (16 June 2010)

British Institute Of Hypnotherapy v David Holland [2010] DRS 8559 (16 June 2010)

The complainant has established legally protectable goodwill in the name 'British Institute of Hypnotherapy' through continuous use since at least 2002. The respondent's registration and use of the domain names is abusive as it is likely to cause confusion and unfairly divert business, taking unfair advantage of and being detrimental to the complainant's rights.

Citation
[2010] DRS 8559
Parties
Complainant: British Institute of Hypnotherapy; Respondent: David Holland
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
16 June 2010
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Outcome
Domain names to be transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Registration, Passing Off, Goodwill, Abusive Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

British Institute of Hypnotherapy

Complainant

David Holland

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination

  1. 1 Whether the complainant has rights in the name 'British Institute of Hypnotherapy'
  2. 2 Whether the domain names are abusive registrations in the hands of the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant has established legally protectable goodwill in the name 'British Institute of Hypnotherapy' through continuous use since at least 2002. The respondent's registration and use of the domain names is abusive as it is likely to cause confusion and unfairly divert business, taking unfair advantage of and being detrimental to the complainant's rights.

Court Disposition

Domain names to be transferred to complainant

Orders

  • Transfer of all disputed domain names to the complainant