New Minerton Leisure Park v David Little (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2013] DRS 12408 (19 March 2013)

New Minerton Leisure Park v David Little (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2013] DRS 12408 (19 March 2013)

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2013] DRS 12408
Parties
Complainant: New Minerton Leisure Park; Respondent: David Little
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
19 March 2013
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Disputes, Trade Marks
Intellectual Property Domain Name Disputes Trade Marks

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

New Minerton Leisure Park

Complainant

David Little

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.