Miles v Information Commissioner [2023] UKFTT 955 (GRC) (10 November 2023)

Miles v Information Commissioner [2023] UKFTT 955 (GRC) (10 November 2023)

The application was struck out because the Commissioner had taken appropriate steps to respond to the complaint, achieving the purpose of the application, and there was no reasonable prospect of the application succeeding.

Citation
[2023] UKFTT 955 (GRC)
Parties
Applicant: David Miles; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
10 November 2023
Procedural Posture
Information Rights Appeal / Strike Out Application Decided Without a Hearing
Outcome
Application struck out
Legal Topics
Subject Access Request, Section 166 Data Protection Act 2018, Tribunal Procedure Rule 8(3)(c), Complaint Handling by Regulator

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Miles

Applicant

The Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Information Rights Appeal / Strike Out Application Decided Without a Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the Information Commissioner failed to take appropriate steps to respond to a complaint under section 166 Data Protection Act 2018
  2. 2 Whether the application should be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success

Ratio Decidendi

The application was struck out because the Commissioner had taken appropriate steps to respond to the complaint, achieving the purpose of the application, and there was no reasonable prospect of the application succeeding.

Court Disposition

Application struck out

Orders

  • The application is struck out under rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.