Ringside Boxing Ltd v David Rawlings (Summary Decision _No Action) [2014] DRS 13745 (07 March 2014)

Ringside Boxing Ltd v David Rawlings (Summary Decision _No Action) [2014] DRS 13745 (07 March 2014)

The complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive or in bad faith under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2014] DRS 13745
Parties
Complainant: Ringside Boxing Ltd; Respondent: David Rawlings
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
07 March 2014
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Complaint dismissed
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Marks
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trade Marks

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ringside Boxing Ltd

Complainant

David Rawlings

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration by the respondent was abusive or in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive or in bad faith under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint dismissed

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name