Mycashnow.com Inc v Whitt [2006] DRS 3223 (10 March 2006)
The complainant established rights in the name 'mycashnow' and 'mycashnow.com' prior to the domain registration. The respondent, associated with a pattern of registering domain names corresponding to well-known marks without apparent rights, registered and used the domain in a manner unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights. The domain name is therefore an abusive registration under the Policy.
- Citation
- [2006] DRS 3223
- Parties
- Complainant: MyCashNow.com, Inc.; Respondent: David Whitt
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Decision of Independent Expert
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld; domain name to be transferred to complainant.
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Abusive Registration, Trademark Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MyCashNow.com, Inc.
Complainant
David Whitt
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Decision of Independent Expert
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the respondent is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established rights in the name 'mycashnow' and 'mycashnow.com' prior to the domain registration. The respondent, associated with a pattern of registering domain names corresponding to well-known marks without apparent rights, registered and used the domain in a manner unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights. The domain name is therefore an abusive registration under the Policy.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld; domain name to be transferred to complainant.
Orders
- Transfer of the domain name mycashnow.me.uk to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment