David Wraige v IC (Environmental Information Regulations 2004) [2015] UKFTT 2015_0001 (GRC) (22 June 2015)

The Tribunal held that the requested information was environmental information within the meaning of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 and should be disclosed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2015] UKFTT 2015_0001 (GRC)
Parties: Applicant: David Wraige; Respondent: Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 22 June 2015
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome: appeal allowed
Legal Topics: Environmental Information Regulations 2004, Freedom of Information

Environmental Law Information Law Environmental Information Regulations 2004 Freedom of Information

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

David Wraige

Applicant

Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the requested information falls within the scope of Environmental Information Regulations 2004
2 Whether the Information Commissioner correctly applied the regulations

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the requested information was environmental information within the meaning of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 and should be disclosed.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

The Information Commissioner is ordered to require disclosure of the requested information

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.